Arne Duncan thinks your kids should spend more time in school. Well, President Obama said it, but we all know this idea flows from his Secretary of Education and ex-Chicago Schools boss, Duncan.
Meanwhile, in Britain, teachers are asking to scrap the whole idea of homework in primary grades.
These two ideas really do need to be discussed together.
More time in American schools, longer days or more days, is probably a terrible idea. At least it is a terrible idea without completely changing American education, and American schools first. And I'm not saying this for the same reason the paranoid wackos at FoxNews are saying it. I'm saying it because, if we ever stop and think, we know that doing more of something which is not working is rarely a good way to accomplish something.
The school as we know it has to be re-designed. "School" as it usually is today, is a factory. It is a series of small lecture halls, with the day divided into discrete segments discussing unrelated information. It divides things in every way. By age, by random measurement of "intelligence," by wealth of family. It is a design that was doubtful at the start (around 1840 as we have 'learned' previously) and a design which is now as far out of touch with our contemporary world as an 1840s iron mill would be.
"School" has to become something altogether different. A place for collaboration and exploration - a place where learners come together. A place where learners group according to needs and interests.
And if we re-design schools, then we can consider the school day.
Because, I do agree, our notion of the school day is ridiculous as well. We start in the early morning when surely every adolescent body clock desperately wants to be asleep. We take long summers off but miss the essential breaks people need throughout the year (most other nations do this better than the US, with holiday every six weeks or so and far more four day weeks). And we shutter our schools, which contain crucial community and family supports (libraries, gyms, health facilities, meeting rooms, theatres) most evenings.
So, if schools were redesigned to be open, non-age-graded, non-subject-divided, places, then the school day should lengthen as well. Schools should be open most of the hours of the day. They should feed kids when kids are hungry. They should offer library and gym access. They should give access to kids (and adults) to things like music, art, and sports in the evenings and nights. All of what we now call "homework" should happen in school so that homework is no longer a simple reflection of a student's socio-economic class (is a parent home to help with homework? does a child have time for homework? - or are real world concerns intruding? what's the parent's education? is there a safe, quiet environment to do academic work?). Students could do more things, catch up on things, move ahead on things, if the school day was longer.
But: does that mean the teacher's day should be longer? Hell No. We'd need more teachers, with more diverse interests. And we'd need teachers who might choose to work different hours as well.
Does it mean the student's day should actually be longer? Probably not. Instead, just as in universities, students would have more choices. They'd be able to schedule their day so it fit their needs (what a crazy idea!), take breaks as they needed, or, if school really were "that safe place," they could effectively hide there.
Of course my vision of a longer school day is very different from Arne Duncan's. That's because I want systemic change and he is a 'tinkerer.' He rose to fame in Chicago not because he did anything particularly dramatic or well (he did not), but simply because he is a better collaborator and communicator than Paul Vallas (so is Dick Cheney, but, ya know...). Essentially, nothing actually changed in Chicago schools while Duncan was in charge, they simply did things "less badly."
I am tired of "less badly," and I think President Obama should be as well. And it interesting, because the Chicago area (suburbs, not city) led the way earlier this decade in the investigation of "learning center" schools (halfway to what I am suggesting here). So if Duncan was interested in actual school change he had lots of evidence within a 25 minute or so drive from his office. And if Obama had really been "palling around with terrorists," he'd know this argument as well.
Anyway, longer school day? Sure Arne. Just change the schools first, and we'll all be there when we need to be.
- Ira Socol
Monday, April 13, 2009
Arne Duncan's Long Day
Kategori
arne duncan,
Barack Obama,
educational policy,
longer school day
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Procter&Gamble has the tagline very wrong, but their Olympics ads explain what is crucially wrong with the argument espoused by those w...
-
(1) ending required sameness (2) rejecting the flipped classroom (3) re-thinking rigor (4) its not about 1:1 (5) start ...
-
There are two big things going on in the world this week, one fifty years old, one absolutely current, which should keep your students talki...
-
Would Walter Cronkite be happy with the way Walter Cronkite's death has been reported? And what does that say about the way in which we ...
-
I ended up in two big educational debates this past week. One was about "clickers" - those "Classroom Response Systems" ...
-
In 1994 the United States government added the requirement to "Section 504" 1 that all schools (primary, secondary, post-second...
-
A conversation on the SpeEdChange list (see right column) asked about free solutions. So lets go public with this. This is important because...
-
I was working on a lesson with sixth graders and middle school teachers in doing math without any tools, just in your head. Not memorizatio...
-
“It’s just like living in a village, where it’s actually hard to lie because everybody knows the truth already,” Tufekci said [ Zeynep Tufek...
-
"Here’s what I think: learning styles may exist (although the studies that show that they do are generally specious), but they’re large...
No comments:
Post a Comment