New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg is an odd candidate for "Luddite of the Year" - but he's making that title his goal.
As schools around the world adopt mobile phones and other hand-held devices as essential educational content delivery systems, as discreet disability accommodations, and as a platform from which to teach appropriate technology use, the Mayor, head of a school system that can barely graduate 51% of secondary students who haven't dropped out by tenth grade, is leading a campaign to make life in school less relevant.
This is all pretty sad coming from a guy doing "pre-campaigning" for President as "The Education Mayor," and even sadder considering he built his fortune using technologies he won't allow students to use.
To make himself sound completely ridiculous, the Mayor told a radio show this morning that, "students use cellphones to cheat on tests, look at pornography and discuss unimportant things like dinner plans with their parents." [The New York Times] Well, ya know Your Honor, students use paper and their mouths to cheat on tests, look at pornography and discuss unimportant things every day in your fourth rate schools. You could ban paper, pens, pencils, talking, and perhaps sign language as well, but its still a ridiculous argument.
The way to get students to use technology appropriately, whether that technology is Gutenberg's or Virgin Mobile's, is to bring it in to the classroom, to teach with it, to teach about it, and to make it part of the educational experience. And the way to engage students is to use the information technology that is an essential part of their lives to help them learn and communicate.
Unfortunately this debate too often devolves into the ridiculous "safety" vs. "it's not the way I went to school" debate. Which is typical of "news" within the technophobic New York Times, but highly unfortunate.
If your school bans the mobile phone, ask your administrators why an educational institution would ban the most critical communication system of the time? Ask your administrators exactly what future they are preparing their students for?
- Ira Socol
for the skeptics - a little documentation
Mobile Phones in Educational Settings
Potential of Mobile Phones - Active Learning
Educational Multi-Media on Mobiles
Sub-Saharan Africa Mobile Multimedia Classroom
Sydney Australia E-School
Friday, August 10, 2007
The "Education Mayor" vs. Education
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Procter&Gamble has the tagline very wrong, but their Olympics ads explain what is crucially wrong with the argument espoused by those w...
-
(1) ending required sameness (2) rejecting the flipped classroom (3) re-thinking rigor (4) its not about 1:1 (5) start ...
-
There are two big things going on in the world this week, one fifty years old, one absolutely current, which should keep your students talki...
-
Would Walter Cronkite be happy with the way Walter Cronkite's death has been reported? And what does that say about the way in which we ...
-
I ended up in two big educational debates this past week. One was about "clickers" - those "Classroom Response Systems" ...
-
In 1994 the United States government added the requirement to "Section 504" 1 that all schools (primary, secondary, post-second...
-
A conversation on the SpeEdChange list (see right column) asked about free solutions. So lets go public with this. This is important because...
-
I was working on a lesson with sixth graders and middle school teachers in doing math without any tools, just in your head. Not memorizatio...
-
“It’s just like living in a village, where it’s actually hard to lie because everybody knows the truth already,” Tufekci said [ Zeynep Tufek...
-
"Here’s what I think: learning styles may exist (although the studies that show that they do are generally specious), but they’re large...
No comments:
Post a Comment